Election Tribunal: witnesses reveal how INEC cancelled Akpabio’s results

More revealing facts, evidences and testimonies have continued to trail the on-going hearing session on the petition filed by Senator Godswill Akpabio seeking for nullification of the declaration by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of Dr.  Christopher Ekpenyong, as the Senator elect.

National Assembly Elections Petition Tribunal sitting in Uyo, on Friday admitted more witnesses to give testimonies on the National Assembly election conducted  in Ikot Ekpene Senatorial District on February 23, 2019.

“Wonders they say shall never end”, this has been the experience of witnesses at the on-going National Assembly Elections Petition tribunal. Witnesses have informed the tribunal  that INEC surprised them with shocking news of cancellation on collated results compiled from their Units and Wards and also alleged that INEC has reproduced new voters register, which they said were not used on election day.

Seven witnesses that testified on Senator Akpabio’s petition told the three-man panel of the tribunal that they were so amazed to hear that collated election results obtained from their units and wards were cancelled by INEC after they were announced at respective polling  units and wards.

They added that the petitioner, Senator Godswill Akpabio won convincingly from all the units and wards that results  were collated and announced.

According to the Ward Agent in Okon Ward 8 Essien Udim Local Government Area,  he was shocked to hear that the results he signed at his ward collation centre were cancelled by INEC in Uyo, and insisted that he only heard about the cancellation in the court room.

Responding, the lead counsel to the third respondent (INEC),  Mr. Ifeoluwa Otediran, Esq. said that the reason why INEC cancelled election results in 17 out of 20 pulling units in Okon Ward 8 was because voters resister used for accreditation were not ticked, and that INEC believed that there was no accreditation of voters.

“My Lord,  it is not true. There was accreditation and our names were ticked in my Ward before we were allowed to cast our votes and the same thing was done in other polling units which our Party agents informed me about. There was no cancellation in my presence. I was a Ward collation officer for my Party”, the stunned Witness replied Otediran.

Testifying on INEC form EC8B1 for code 06 (Odoro Ikot Ward 6) of 05 registration area, a  Witness told the tribunal that he was suprised to hear  for the first time inside the tribunal that results in the entire 10 polling units in his Ward were cancelled by INEC in Uyo. He further testified that voters register presented to him in the tribunal was far different from the one INEC brought to the area on election day.

“My Lord, these documents tendered here are  different from the one INEC gave to us in all the polling units in Ward 8 in Odoro Ikot, Essien Udim Local Government Area on election day.

“It is a surprise that INEC gave us photocopied documents. I am surprise that there were original documents. Our names were tick on the voters register they gave to us but this one brought here at the tribunal as evidence by INEC; it is shocking  that our names on the box are not ticked”. Witness testified.

The same sad scenario was also experienced in Ukana West Ward 10 and Ukana East Ward 9, both agents discovered at the tribunal that all collated results in 7 and 10 polling units in the two Wards were cancelled by INEC without their knowledge.

They also lamented that certified true copy of voters register presented at the tribunal by INEC; their passport and accreditation marked tick on the register at the polling units were not found on the register .

The witnesses also testified that voters register that were used for accreditation on election day were  rough, and according to them, was as a result that

 ad-hoc staff were opening them consistently for accreditation of voters but they were surprised that what was presented by INEC were new documents.

The testimonies by witnesses according to legal analysts was revealing of how some officials of INEC conspired to cancelled the results of Senator Akpabio to reduce his votes and declare his opponent as the winner of the election. More revelations are expected as the Petitioner calls more witnesses.

The lead counsel to the petitioner, Mr.  S. I. Ameh, SAN was granted June 19 and 20 by the tribunal  to present all his witnesses to continue their testimonies.